top of page

WRD 111: COMPOSITION AND COMMUNICATION II

This course moves students into a more complex research process and introduces the use of argumentation.  Working in groups students create a proposal, build an argument for a change in policy or practice surrounding an issue of current controversy, and create a final digital project to present their argument.

COURSE DESCRIPTION/OVERVIEW AND GOALS

The University of Kentucky has been the site of controversy and activism throughout its history. In this class we will examine activism and controversy in UK’s past and make connections with activism and controversy currently active in and around the UK campus and larger community. 

Students in this course will work in the M. I. King Library archives, as well as doing significant research online and in the other UK Library holdings. 

Composition and Communication II is the second of two general education courses focused on integrated oral, written, and visual communication skill development emphasizing critical inquiry and research. In this course, students will explore issues of public concern using rhetorical analysis to engage in deliberation over those issues and ultimately propose solutions based on well-developed arguments.  Students will sharpen their ability to conduct research; compose and communicate in written, oral, and visual modalities; and work effectively in groups. The focus will be on investigating current public issues using primary and secondary research and making arguments that are strongly grounded in that research.

Students will be grouped in teams, each of which will explore a different local or significant public issue. For the first half of the semester, students will decide on their team focus and conduct significant primary and secondary research on the issue. In the second half of the semester, teams will develop digital projects to communicate their well-argued solutions to audiences beyond the classroom.

STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES

By the end of the semester, students will be able to:

  • Revise their written and oral presentations, in collaboration with peers, instructor, librarians, and pertinent members of the public.

  • Critique the work of peers and professionals.

  • Refine their speaking, writing, and visual communication skills, focusing on matters of construction, design, and delivery style.

  • Employ advanced strategies for developing ideas and analyzing arguments, with greater emphasis on addressing and mediating issues of public interest, and with evidence of critical thinking in both the conception and the development of the thesis.

  • Conduct significant research on a subject, using the resources of the UK Libraries

  • Compose in writing and deliver orally with visuals (in a face-to-face or digital environment) at least one major project grounded in scholarly research in a manner that is appropriate and effective for the audience, purpose, and occasion.

ASSIGNMENTS AND MAJOR PROJECTS

Attendance, notebook entries, and in-class work – 20%: 10% at midterm and 10% at finals

Our class is centered on research and argument. In order for any genuine and significant inquiry to be accomplished in this way we will have to do our research in ethical ways. Ethical inquiry begins in the classroom between students and instructors developing an environment of learning for everyone in a way that students take ownership of the class. This doesn’t mean that the instructor takes a backseat, in fact the instructor plays an important role in pushing for that learning to take place. The role of the student is to push back in constructive ways, not in resistance, but in mutually productive ways. This kind of learning can only be done when the student is not only present in the classroom, but prepared, engaged, and continually revising thoughts and ideas.

Participation understood in this manner means much more than attendance, and even more than making sure to ask a question in class every once in a while, or responding to a prompt in a discussion (although it means this as well). I will be asking you to continually take notes inside and outside the classroom in the notebook dedicated to this class. These will not be for quizzes, but for a record of your own learning, a learning journal of sorts that demonstrates the development of your thinking in class.  This writing includes our daily free writes. I will ask you to turn in these notes periodically, so please be diligent about keeping them – they are part of your participation grade.


While regular attendance will earn you points, so will regular discussion contributions. Significant contributions to workshops will also be required; this means not just saying something is “good” or “needs some work,” but offering positive and constructive feedback. There may also be free writes and reading quizzes that will provide a way to help you practice and perform the skills and concepts we are learning in terms of critical inquiry. These will make you responsible for the material in the class, as well as move you toward taking ownership of the class.

You will be responsible for homework, free writes, and in-class work.  They count for 1/3 of your participation grade.  You cannot get higher than a C if you do not do these required components.

Short Papers- 30% of your final grade

You will individually do two short papers that you will have the ability to get feedback on and revise, if you like.  Each paper is worth 15% of your final grade.

  1. Visual analysis: During the research phase of your project you will write a 750-1000 word essay in which you do a rhetorical analysis of a poster of your choice.  You will analyze the way that the creator(s) of the text use rhetoric and argumentation to make their own argument and be arguing for the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of their choices. 

  2. Rhetorical analysis: During the introductory research phase of your project you will write a 750-1000 word essay in which you do a rhetorical analysis of an Engaged Citizen essay.  You will analyze the way that the creator(s) of the text use rhetoric and argumentation to make their own argument and be arguing for the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of their choices. 


Final Research Project Portfolio – 50% of your final grade


You and your team will create four different types of writing/communication as part of this assignment: group proposal with individual stakeholder analyses, an annotated bibliography, research update video, and final project. Each assignment will receive feedback, but you will only receive an official letter grade based upon the entire portfolio as a whole.  In addition to the assignments below, you will also include a team written reflection letter of 1-2 pages single-spaced as an introduction to your portfolio.  This portfolio is made up of final drafts only and the grade will be divided as follows: 60% is based on successful execution of assigned pieces, 30% is based on in-class final presentation, and 10% is based on the average of your team evaluations. (We will talk more about this in class).

  1. Team Project Proposal: After you and your team identify a particular question (or sets of questions) that you want to explore, you will create a formal proposal for your final project. This proposal will be a minimum of 6-pages (approximately 2000 words), and it will contain the following sections: (1) a description of your main question and a mini-argument for why this question is significant enough to explore, (2) a description of what the central problem or issue is, and (3) an analysis of your targeted audience, (4) a description of the media your project will use and why this is appropriate for the audience and topic, and a (5) detailed timeline and plan.  While the main body of the proposal will be written as a team, each team member will also have an individual component due. You will each contribute to a section on the stakeholders for your issue.  You will write a 800-1000 word mini-essay in which you do a rhetorical analysis of one single written text, i.e. website, newspaper article, pamphlet, opinion piece, etc. that was produced by your unique stakeholder.  You will not be arguing a pro/con position about the topic of the text in this paper, but rather analyzing the way that the creator(s) of the text use rhetoric and argumentation to make their own argument and whether or not you believe it is effective.

  2. Annotated bibliography: To help keep track of your research, as a group you’ll create an annotated bibliography that is split into primary and secondary sources (primary sources are created directly by those involved in your issue and secondary sources are created about your issue, often pertaining to the primary sources). You should have at least 6 sources for each person in your group. Each source should be properly cited in MLA or APA format and include a ~100–word summary of each source, as well as the name or initials of the team member who located and summarized the source. If your sources are unbalanced in type, content, or position, you will be required to locate and annotate new sources before you submit the final portfolio

  3. Research Update video: You will need to update me on your progress and research findings midway through your project. This update should be a formal video presentation that outlines what you have found so far in your research. You should describe at least three significant pieces of research you have discovered (e.g., interviews you have conducted, articles you have read, images you have found, etc.) and explain how this research has helped to shape your project so far.  You should conclude by revisiting your proposal and discussing whether or not your original topic and argument has changed at all. If so, explain how some of your ideas have shifted and changed. If not, explain how your original ideas have been strengthened by the research you have found. You will complete this research update as video recording. You will be graded on this research update as a group, and your entire group must contribute. NOTE: This is a speech, even if it is recorded.  If you are reading directly from your notes in the video your team will lose 5% off your final grade.

  4. Final Project: Your group will be creating a major digital project throughout most of the semester. This is a lengthy and significant argument that tackles a serious issue or problem that is currently being experienced by an identifiable group of stakeholders and also has roots in past activism on campus or in the community. Your group does not need to pretend that you are going to “save the world” by creating a website or making a documentary, but you do want to create some kind of project that may actually address the problem. You can choose which forms of media best fit your project’s goals and audience needs. For some topics, a website might make sense. You might also consider such forms as podcasts and videos. Once I evaluate and respond to your group’s proposal, I will provide you with a specific set of constraints for your project. Your final project must have both a text/audio component and a visual component.

SELECTED ASSIGNMENTS

Below are a sample of the assignments from this course.

VISUAL ANALYSIS ESSAY

During the introductory research phase of your project you will write a 750-1000 word essay (roughly 3-5 pages) in which you do a visual analysis of a poster from around the campus or online. You should take a good quality picture of the poster, if it is local, that you are analyzing to include at the beginning of your essay. You will analyze the way that the creator(s) of the poster use design, rhetoric, and argumentation to make their own argument and argue whether or not these choices were effective.  If you are uncertain about the appropriateness or usefulness of the poster chosen, you can email me or show me a picture of the poster no later than class on XXXX.


A successful essay will include an image of your poster at the beginning and the following components: an engaging introduction, a summary of the creator’s overall argument (what do you think they are trying to convince the viewer of), a thoughtful conclusion, and a works cited page.



In addition to the components mentioned above, the body of the essay should primarily be critical analysis (with specific evidence from the poster) of 2 or more of the following 5 elements of the poster examined:

  • the use of color,

  • the use of arrangement and design,

  • the intended audience,

  • the use of style (both writing and images)

  • the larger context of the poster

Each of the elements mentioned above should get at least one substantial paragraph and up to one page worth of writing.


You should carefully reread and proofread your text before submitting it via Canvas as a Word doc.

ARGUMENT ANALYSIS ESSAY

During the introductory research phase of your project you will write a 750-1000 word essay (roughly 3-5 pages) in which you do an argument analysis of some sort of written text, i.e. newspaper article, journal article, opinion piece, etc. that is related to in-class work or to your proposal topic. You will analyze the way that the creator(s) of the text use rhetoric and argumentation to make their own argument and argue whether their choices are effective in convincing their audience.  You must analyze either one of the first six essays in the 2014-2015 copy of "The Engaged Citizen" or an artifact from our visit to the King Library.  If you choose to use an archival artifact, make sure you take a picture of it and notes adequate enough to accurately represent the content in your project.  Some items may be available online through Explore UK, but you must verify that before the King Library closes.


A successful essay will include the following components: an engaging introduction, a summary of the creator’s overall argument, a thoughtful conclusion, and a works cited page.


In addition to the components mentioned above, the body of the essay should primarily be critical analysis (with specific evidence from the text) of 2 or more of the following 5 elements of the artifact examined:


  • the use of evidence,

  • the use of argument/rhetorical strategies,

  • the intended audience,

  • the use of style

  • the stakeholder’s conclusions


Each of the elements mentioned above should get at least one substantial paragraph and up to one pages worth of writing.


You should carefully reread and proofread your text before submitting it.

FINAL ASSIGNMENT OVERVIEW AND INSTRUCTIONS

Overview

In groups of 3–5 students, you will select a public controversy to research and write about throughout the semester. Each group will choose their own issue that is currently in the news at the local and/or national levels. Your group will find original documents produced by those involved in the controversy and secondary sources written about the controversy. You may also produce your own data through interviews with those involved or by observing some facet of the controversy in action.

Since you are expected to offer original insights, you will not be allowed to select a subject that has been thoroughly researched, such as the abortion controversy, legalization of marijuana, etc.

Possible Final Project Group Formats

Below are a few format options for your final project.  These are not exhaustive.  If your group brainstorms another format that suits your topic and research, I am open to hearing why and how it is the best choice for your group.  Please consider these as inspiration. 

Regardless of their format, however, each final project must include a written-text version as well as a recorded copy, if applicable, including an MLA or APA-formatted Works Cited list.

Digital Project

You will use digital tools to launch your message in a broader public sphere. This artifact must including visuals (moving or still), graphics, and spoken/written words. For example, the group may decide to produce a video for YouTube that includes a voice-over and moving and still images. Or, the group may produce an audio essay that is loaded onto a blog with visuals and other graphics (see NPR for examples). The digital project should be produced in a genre that is fitting for your topic and familiar to the public audience you are trying to reach. There is no set length requirement because it will vary by group size and topic but it should be long enough to be persuasive. You must include not only supporting evidence, but a fair engagement with opposing arguments and a persuasive response to those arguments. These projects should be submitted by posting them online on a public site (such as a blog, Facebook, YouTube, etc.) and a script or detailed outline with citations must be submitted as well.

Timeline

Project Topic Proposal Due: Week 7

Final Project Proposal and Timeline: Week 9

Stakeholder Analysis Due: Week 11

Annotated Bibliography Due: Week 12

Research Update video Due: Week 12

Group Final Project Portfolio Due: Week 16 (Sunday, April 26)

Group Peer Review Evaluations Due: Week 16 (Last day of class)


Required components for all projects

Project Topic Proposal

This assignment is simple--pick one topic that you are all interested in, that can be argued about in an interesting way, and do the following: 1) List 4-6 stakeholders (individuals or groups who are connected to the issue and/or will be affected by your issue) that represent a diversity of opinions on the issue.  I suggest that you make use of Opposing Viewpoints and the CQ Researcher databases to help you identify a variety of stakeholders.  2) List 3-5 open-ended questions (questions that require more than a yes/no answer) that these stakeholders are interested in. These questions will provide you with a starting point for researching more about your topic.  I.e. "How can coal towns bring new industry to their communities when mines close?" NOT "Can mining towns find new business when mines close?" 3) List 1-3 sources created by each stakeholder in a bibliography formated in MLA or APA format.  These sources must be CREATED BY your stakeholder (i.e. website, advertisement, YouTube video, commercial, brochure, magazine article, etc.) not just be ABOUT them. 

Final Project Proposal and Timeline

After you and your group identify a particular question (or sets of questions) that you want to explore, you will create a formal proposal for your final project. This proposal will be a minimum of 8-pages (approximately 2400 words), and it will contain the following sections: (1) a description of your main question and a mini-argument for why this question is significant enough to explore, (2) a description of what the central problem or issue is, and (3) who the various stakeholders are, (4) an analysis of your targeted audience, (5) a description of the media your project will use and why this is appropriate for the audience and topic, and a (6) detailed timeline and plan.

Individual Stakeholder Analysis Position Paper

Every group will generate a list of major stakeholders within the controversy that your group is studying. Within your team, each group member will select one stakeholder that they will become an expert on, irrespective of your own position on the issue. Using careful research and critical thinking, each team member will write a rhetorical analysis paper of at least 2000 words (~6 pages) analyzing his/her stakeholder’s position, argument, and rhetorical strategies as presented in a single artifact such as a brochure, website, advertisement, etc created by this stakeholder. Each group member’s rhetorical analysis should focus on one artifact produced by the stakeholder and should include at least two supporting images and/or graphics. These analyses should strive to provide a fair analysis of your stakeholder’s position by quoting from and closely engaging with sources produced by that stakeholder.

Annotated Bibliography

Research on your topic will be an ongoing and continuous process as questions come up throughout the semester. To help keep track of your research, as a group you’ll create an annotated bibliography that is split into primary and secondary sources (primary sources are created directly by those involved in your issue and secondary sources are created about your issue by outside parties (often researchers or reporters and often pertaining to the primary sources). You should have at least four sources for each person in your group. Each source should be properly cited in MLA or APA format and include a ~100–word summary of each source.

Research Update Video

You will need to update me on your progress and research findings midway through your project. This update should be a formal video presentation that outlines what you have found so far in your research. You should describe at least three significant pieces of research you have discovered (e.g., interviews you have conducted, articles you have read, images you have found, etc.) and explain how this research has helped to shape your project so far. You should conclude by revisiting your proposal and discussing whether or not your original topic and argument has changed at all. If so, explain how some of your ideas have shifted and changed. If not, explain how your original ideas have been strengthened by the research you have found. You will complete this research update as video recording. You will be graded on this research update as a group, and your entire group must contribute.  This does not have to be an elaborate video, and can be either a Powerpoint slideshow with a voiceover, or a video of each of you (together or separately) talking about a portion of your research update.

Group Peer Review Evaluations

Each member of the group will be responsible for grading each of their team members using a rubric of multiple choice and narrative questions and assigning a final percentage grade.  This evaluation covers all aspects of the group project participation and production.  You will address each person’s contribution to the project and the grade you give your classmates will be worth a full letter grade in their final project grade.  If you give a classmate an abnormally low grade without having sought assistance from me during the course of the group work, you will be required to provide detailed reasoning for the grade.  This is not an opportunity for you to passive-aggressively “get back” at a teammate who did not carry their full weight.  It is, however, an opportunity for you to honestly and directly comment on your teammate’s work and attitude.  The group peer review evaluations will be 10% of the final project portfolio grade.

bottom of page